Log in
Search
Latest topics
» My current avatar photoby roddie Today at 8:48 pm
» It's the X Wing that has a canard
by 1975 control line guy Today at 8:05 pm
» Cox 020 PeeWee rebuild questions
by balogh Today at 4:39 pm
» Free Flight Radio Assist
by TD ABUSER Today at 2:58 pm
» Pathé Modeling Videos
by Levent Suberk Today at 2:10 pm
» New Model Build
by rdw777 Today at 10:28 am
» My latest doodle...
by layback209 Today at 1:20 am
» Drones, pretty nifty...........
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 6:55 pm
» Project Cox .049 r/c & Citabrian Champion
by roddie Yesterday at 6:20 pm
» My N-1R build log
by roddie Yesterday at 3:27 pm
» Octura engines?
by UncleLumpy Yesterday at 8:16 am
» Tatone EM-7
by sosam117 Yesterday at 7:50 am
Cox Engine of The Month
"Buskellised" ED Racer 2.49 diesel
Page 1 of 1
"Buskellised" ED Racer 2.49 diesel
Pete Buskell was a well recognised model engine tuner in the 50s and 60s. He built engines around the ED Racer
But his name was widely used in the term "buskellising" for modifying engines like the ED Racer.
Why modify one? Easy - the exhaust stacks while, to my eyes, are things of beauty concentrated noise and restricted the ability to tune these engines.
That combined with the imposition of silencers made for a handsome but clumsy engine.
Not very practical for a combat model, unlikely to survive a prang and weighty!
I have found with diesels that the open cylinder distributes noise to a more acceptable level compared with a restricting stack but that is a matter of opinion.
The Ed Racer was a popular engine and cheaper than an Oliver Tiger - there were plenty around and so a mod made sense. Not the easiest thing to do and I have seen very nasty looking homebrew examples but
I have a "buskellised" ED Racer now fitter with an Oliver Tiger muffler
I am looking forward to firing this one up before cleaning. This was one of those engines for sale that no one realised the significance of. Not valuable but historic.
But his name was widely used in the term "buskellising" for modifying engines like the ED Racer.
Why modify one? Easy - the exhaust stacks while, to my eyes, are things of beauty concentrated noise and restricted the ability to tune these engines.
That combined with the imposition of silencers made for a handsome but clumsy engine.
Not very practical for a combat model, unlikely to survive a prang and weighty!
I have found with diesels that the open cylinder distributes noise to a more acceptable level compared with a restricting stack but that is a matter of opinion.
The Ed Racer was a popular engine and cheaper than an Oliver Tiger - there were plenty around and so a mod made sense. Not the easiest thing to do and I have seen very nasty looking homebrew examples but
I have a "buskellised" ED Racer now fitter with an Oliver Tiger muffler
I am looking forward to firing this one up before cleaning. This was one of those engines for sale that no one realised the significance of. Not valuable but historic.
ian1954- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2688
Join date : 2011-11-16
Age : 70
Location : England
Re: "Buskellised" ED Racer 2.49 diesel
Nice! That muffler looks good enough to have been original-equipment. Was it a production part made to fit, or completely homemade?
Re: "Buskellised" ED Racer 2.49 diesel
roddie wrote:Nice! That muffler looks good enough to have been original-equipment. Was it a production part made to fit, or completely homemade?
It is an Oliver Tiger muffler and not modified.
ian1954- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2688
Join date : 2011-11-16
Age : 70
Location : England
Re: "Buskellised" ED Racer 2.49 diesel
ian1954 wrote:roddie wrote:Nice! That muffler looks good enough to have been original-equipment. Was it a production part made to fit, or completely homemade?
It is an Oliver Tiger muffler and not modified.
Yes.. sorry I missed that. So... knowing that you're living a "bachelor" life-style currently... I'd be surprised if you haven't run the engine since posting.. You could attach a hose to that header... and direct the diesel-exhaust goo and noise down into a prepared pail.. while wearing polarized designer eye-protection...
Re: "Buskellised" ED Racer 2.49 diesel
Ian , would opening the exhaust up too much lose the restriction of comp. and cause the engine to have less power than more ? Hope you get to run it !
getback- Top Poster
-
Posts : 10430
Join date : 2013-01-18
Age : 67
Location : julian , NC
Re: "Buskellised" ED Racer 2.49 diesel
Ian, why the need for a muffler? Is this due to radial porting? Generally most of the diesels were running are very quiet aside from a few which generally are old school diesels. While I have seen a loss of performance, it seems to make up for it in reliability of starting due to heat retention.
Ken Cook- Top Poster
- Posts : 5634
Join date : 2012-03-27
Location : pennsylvania
Re: "Buskellised" ED Racer 2.49 diesel
Ian,
A USA collector was selling his NIB collection of model engines and when I saw these I thought of you.
"British and Best."
The ED Super sold for $160.50 USD, the Snipe not so dear at $71.00.
I opted for a couple of his Enya's with a price of admission considerably less.
Bob
A USA collector was selling his NIB collection of model engines and when I saw these I thought of you.
"British and Best."
The ED Super sold for $160.50 USD, the Snipe not so dear at $71.00.
I opted for a couple of his Enya's with a price of admission considerably less.
Bob
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 11222
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Re: "Buskellised" ED Racer 2.49 diesel
Ken Cook wrote: Ian, why the need for a muffler? Is this due to radial porting? Generally most of the diesels were running are very quiet aside from a few which generally are old school diesels. While I have seen a loss of performance, it seems to make up for it in reliability of starting due to heat retention.
Generally, with a diesel there is no need for a muffler but try explaining that to local government officials in the late 60s who enforced noise regulations. Diesels are not quiet but the sound doesn't carry as far and as best as I can describe is a growl or a bark rather than a higher pitched whine.
Nevertheless, local government rules meant fitting a silencer whether it was needed or not. All the local flying fields I frequented as a young lad have been lost - the fields are there but IC engines are banned. Most clubs insist on silencers for fear of losing their license.
There was also another reason for fitting a muffler like this one and that was to divert the exhaust away from the engine area and over the wing.
Also - this applies to Oliver Tigers - the Combat Specials were also fitted with the muffler modified as below. There could not be much noise reduction but it had an effect on the engines efficiency flying combat.
Some and this one is a Copeman tuned version has the outlets angled to increase the area
I don't have any of these examples and, following the demise of Tom Ridley (he took over Oliver Tiger engine production and passed away last year), I am not likely to. Oliver Tiger engines have since sky rocketed in price.
The Copeman tuned engine above, well used, went for £192 in July last year and Tom Ridley produced Combat Specials for around
£220 (BNIB) - long waiting list though - the last one auctioned on Fleabay went for £320.
This is now typical for an Olly
The Schneurle Cub was £195 BNIB early last year.
The ED Super Racer with the twin exhaust that Bob posted went for a very reasonable price - it would have been £150 - £170 in the UK but having that one shipped from the USA and the customs duty would have elevated it to $220.
If you note - I say price and not value. As you all know, I collect, build and restore engines. I love the feel, look and enjoy running them - soon I will be in a position to fly with some. I am prepared and have planned for it.
If the "buskellised" ED Racer is a runner then it is a prime candidate for the "Blue Pants" as an example.
But I am now horrified. The hobby we have turned into a sport that relied on having pots of money to compete. Competitive engines for stunt and combat are horrendously expensive. Carbon fibre this and that, ready built models costing thousands ........... maybe it was just me but I no longer saw that as a "hobby".
Then came "Vintage" and a retreat into "Old School". Not cheap (nothing is these days!) but affordable and a level playing filed not based on how much money you can throw at it. Don't misunderstand me - I think the top level flyers are extremely skilled but you need a lot of resources to get up there.
Vintage stunt - Vintage combat - bring it on!
Now there is a dilemma - when the price of what was a common vintage engine sky rockets - the "level playing field" disappears and the chances of new entrants is limited. Then there are collectors like me - I have over twenty Ollies plus several Olly clones that I picked up when no one really wanted them. Well, not sought after. My enjoyment is in looking at the progression and changes in an engine build over the years and being able to handle it close up and personal but they are not out there in the field. Yet!
It is strange what drives the engine market! MVVS 2.5cc engines - glow and diesel, Enya 2.5cc diesels are also commanding ridiculous prices and yet a couple of years ago they were available new! ETA engines have always been through the roof.
I find it odd that engines like the "buskellised" Racer slip though for peanuts. The muffler new was £18.50 and could be transferred to an Olly. The engine is historically rare and represents an era of change in the hobby.
I am rambling agian!
ian1954- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2688
Join date : 2011-11-16
Age : 70
Location : England
Similar topics
» Introducing the Blue Bee, the Blew diesel Medallion, and the disappointing OK Cub diesel.
» My DIESEL fleet and Diesel fuel blending DIY
» Enya .15 diesel MK II
» Diesel Fuel Question
» *Cox Engine of The Month* Submit your pictures! -December 2015- *ENGINE GIVEAWAY*
» My DIESEL fleet and Diesel fuel blending DIY
» Enya .15 diesel MK II
» Diesel Fuel Question
» *Cox Engine of The Month* Submit your pictures! -December 2015- *ENGINE GIVEAWAY*
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum