Log in
Search
Latest topics
» WILLY NILLYby MANDALAY Yesterday at 7:28 pm
» For sale -- Cox Custom Carburetors for Tee Dee engines
by MANDALAY Yesterday at 7:24 pm
» Automobiles you don't see everyday...
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 6:54 pm
» The Beaver chainsaw, Cox's most interesting product
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 5:59 pm
» Jim Walker Firebaby
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 4:58 pm
» COX .020 RC PROJECT
by TD ABUSER Yesterday at 10:11 am
» Thrust Washer
by davidll1984 Yesterday at 8:25 am
» some pics....
by balogh Yesterday at 6:18 am
» Peewee power
by Coxfledgling Yesterday at 3:46 am
» Stick built rubber powered Scientific ME-109
by GallopingGhostler Sat Sep 14, 2024 7:51 pm
» Ode to a dead cat
by GallopingGhostler Sat Sep 14, 2024 7:11 pm
» So Cool If you haven't seen it
by getback Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:25 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
1940's?...............
Page 1 of 1
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 10989
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
cstatman- Platinum Member
-
Posts : 557
Join date : 2021-02-17
Age : 60
Location : San Jose, CA
Re: 1940's?...............
In the 1940's, it wasn't usual that a recruit would lie about his age, so he could early enlist in the US Navy (also Marines) or Army. Does this item follow the same pattern?
Interesting model airplane items collage, but the 1940 seems a bit out of place by itself, as many of the items are dated 1950's to 1960's. The ignition engine seems to have a standard glow plug. I could be wrong on how earlier spark plugs were made, but I'd think it would have a porcelain body for high voltage separation. May be I'm wrong but this is my impression.
Is the ignition engine as-is worth $95.00 US?
Interesting model airplane items collage, but the 1940 seems a bit out of place by itself, as many of the items are dated 1950's to 1960's. The ignition engine seems to have a standard glow plug. I could be wrong on how earlier spark plugs were made, but I'd think it would have a porcelain body for high voltage separation. May be I'm wrong but this is my impression.
Is the ignition engine as-is worth $95.00 US?
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
-
Posts : 5571
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 70
Location : Clovis NM or NFL KC Chiefs
Re: 1940's?...............
GallopingGhostler wrote:
Is the ignition engine as-is worth $95.00 US?
well since its a 'slag' engine....looks like a Rogers to me, then its debatable....unless you're one of those masochists who like running the 'near impossible to run' engines... along the lines of "hullo everyone I'm Fred and I'm a GHQ addict*.."
* insert 'Deezil' 'Rogers' 'Judco' 'katipo' 'Ueda' if you like...
ChrisM
ffkiwi- Gold Member
- Posts : 381
Join date : 2018-07-10
Location : Wellington, NZ
Re: 1940's?...............
Well, the highlight for me was the Cox closed end wrench.
Interesting mixture of stuff. From the very common to the odd......sparker that may be a Rogers. I have one similar but without the fuel tank. The tapered case Babe Bee dates to around 1953/54. Others who knows. The Froom? spinner backplate an interesting addition. No particuar theme other than Control line. Shipping wasn't bad, but not my thing.
Interesting mixture of stuff. From the very common to the odd......sparker that may be a Rogers. I have one similar but without the fuel tank. The tapered case Babe Bee dates to around 1953/54. Others who knows. The Froom? spinner backplate an interesting addition. No particuar theme other than Control line. Shipping wasn't bad, but not my thing.
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 10989
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Re: 1940's?...............
Yeah, got to agree Bob, not worth my $95 either. ChrisM @ffkiwi , thanks for clarfifying the relative quality (lack thereof) of the engine. Life is too short to waste time on a dud engine.
I prefer success stories with lesser loved engines, but certainly not with losers.
I prefer success stories with lesser loved engines, but certainly not with losers.
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
-
Posts : 5571
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 70
Location : Clovis NM or NFL KC Chiefs
Re: 1940's?...............
GallopingGhostler wrote:Yeah, got to agree Bob, not worth my $95 either. ChrisM @ffkiwi , thanks for clarfifying the relative quality (lack thereof) of the engine. Life is too short to waste time on a dud engine.
I prefer success stories with lesser loved engines, but certainly not with losers.
George-some people actually DO like to run them...IIRC there is a 'Slag engine' class that SAM run from time to time. For you young uns here unfamiliar with the term -'slag engines' were made in the 40s...dirt cheap...'cheap and nasty' would be an accurate term-they had no liner-the aluminium piston ran direct in the aluminium cylinder, the contact breaker was usually a joke and similar comments apply to the rest of the engine. You could run them-for a short time-on a fuel that was about 40-50% oil-but because of the material choice and the generally poor fits-they wore out in very short order...'like on like' is never a good combination for moving metal components, rega5rdless of the metal in question.
ChrisM
ffkiwi- Gold Member
- Posts : 381
Join date : 2018-07-10
Location : Wellington, NZ
Re: 1940's?...............
I was amused at the Atwood with the tank mounted backwards. Must have done that in the 40's
Oldenginerod- Top Poster
- Posts : 4005
Join date : 2012-06-15
Age : 61
Location : Drouin, Victoria
Re: 1940's?...............
Oldenginerod wrote:I was amused at the Atwood with the tank mounted backwards. Must have done that in the 40's
I saw that Rod, thought it odd but never made the connection...........
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 10989
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum