Cox Engines Forum
You are not logged in! Please login or register.

Logged in members see NO ADVERTISEMENTS!


Port orientation Cox_ba12




Port orientation Pixel

Log in

I forgot my password

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Tee Dee .020 combat model
by roddie Today at 1:34 pm

» Chocolate chip cookie dough.........
by roddie Today at 1:13 pm

» Purchased the last of any bult engines from Ken Enya
by sosam117 Today at 11:32 am

» Free Flight Radio Assist
by rdw777 Today at 9:24 am

» My latest doodle...
by batjac Yesterday at 9:47 pm

» My N-1R build log
by roddie Yesterday at 8:50 pm

» Funny what you find when you go looking
by rsv1cox Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:21 pm

» Landing-gear tips
by 1975 control line guy Wed Nov 20, 2024 8:17 am

» Cox NaBOO - Just in time for Halloween
by rsv1cox Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:35 pm

» Canada Post strike - We are still shipping :)
by Cox International Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:01 pm

» Duende V model from RC Model magazine 1983.
by getback Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:08 am

» My current avatar photo
by roddie Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:05 pm

Cox Engine of The Month
November-2024
Kim's

"A Space Bug Jr. pulls the Q-Tee up high over Sky Tiger Field"



PAST WINNERS
CEF Traveling Engine

Win This Engine!
Gallery


Port orientation Empty
Live on Patrol


Port orientation

Go down

Port orientation Empty Port orientation

Post  TheotherGeoff Sat May 11, 2013 5:09 pm

It seems that most all Cox 1/2A engines have the ports at the 10:00-4:00 position instead of at the 3:00-9:00 position that would seem most logical for good power. One bypass port is blocked by the crankcase; the other is blocked by the reed housing. Wouldn't they go better with the exhausts at 12:00-6:00 and the bypasses at 3:00-9:00?

Curious Geoff
TheotherGeoff
TheotherGeoff
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster

Posts : 29
Join date : 2013-01-23
Location : Third level of hell

Back to top Go down

Port orientation Empty Re: Port orientation

Post  pkrankow Sat May 11, 2013 6:59 pm

So...are we talking about the exhaust ports? 12:00 being the propeller direction, forward, and 6:00 being the back plate direction, directly backwards.

I am unsure which orientation provides the best evacuation of spent exhaust without stripping the fuel charge with. I have heard indication from people who have more experience than me that about 45 degrees, 1:30/7:30, or 10:30/4:30, providing the best performance.

From my limited number of engines I have found that 3:00/9:00 seems weaker (I have 1 engine that aligns this way), and other orientations are stronger running.

Phil
pkrankow
pkrankow
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 3025
Join date : 2012-10-02
Location : Ohio

Back to top Go down

Port orientation Empty Re: Port orientation

Post  RknRusty Sat May 11, 2013 9:34 pm

TheotherGeoff wrote:It seems that most all Cox 1/2A engines have the ports at the 10:00-4:00 position instead of at the 3:00-9:00 position that would seem most logical for good power. One bypass port is blocked by the crankcase; the other is blocked by the reed housing. Wouldn't they go better with the exhausts at 12:00-6:00 and the bypasses at 3:00-9:00?

Curious Geoff
It would seem so. To have the bypass ports equidistant from the reed at 3:00 and 9:00 seems like they would get the most even distribution of fuel. I have gone to the trouble of putting the crankcase shoulder on 1000 grit paper and knocking a quarter of a thread off to get them to align that way and have never actually seen any difference. It doesn't seem to matter.


_________________
Don't Panic!
...and never Ever think about how good you are at something...
while you're doing it!


My Hot Rock & Blues Playlist
RknRusty
RknRusty
Rest In Peace
Rest In Peace

Posts : 10869
Join date : 2011-08-10
Age : 68
Location : South Carolina, USA

Back to top Go down

Port orientation Empty Re: Port orientation

Post  Cribbs74 Sat May 11, 2013 9:36 pm

RknRusty wrote:
TheotherGeoff wrote:It seems that most all Cox 1/2A engines have the ports at the 10:00-4:00 position instead of at the 3:00-9:00 position that would seem most logical for good power. One bypass port is blocked by the crankcase; the other is blocked by the reed housing. Wouldn't they go better with the exhausts at 12:00-6:00 and the bypasses at 3:00-9:00?

Curious Geoff
It would seem so. To have the bypass ports equidistant from the reed at 3:00 and 9:00 seems like they would get the most even distribution of fuel. I have gone to the trouble of putting the crankcase shoulder on 1000 grit paper and knocking a quarter of a thread off to get them to align that way and have never actually seen any difference. It doesn't seem to matter.


Really? Wow, never thought of that. Do you shim the cylinder afterwards to correct the port timing and close the SPI gap?

Cribbs74
Cribbs74
Moderator

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

2024 Supporter

Posts : 11907
Join date : 2011-10-24
Age : 50
Location : Tuttle, OK

Back to top Go down

Port orientation Empty Re: Port orientation

Post  RknRusty Sat May 11, 2013 9:40 pm

No, the distance is not that much different, barely measurable just to knock off a quarter of a thread's depth. The engines probably varied that much from the factory or else the ports would all be aligned the same anyway.

_________________
Don't Panic!
...and never Ever think about how good you are at something...
while you're doing it!


My Hot Rock & Blues Playlist
RknRusty
RknRusty
Rest In Peace
Rest In Peace

Posts : 10869
Join date : 2011-08-10
Age : 68
Location : South Carolina, USA

Back to top Go down

Port orientation Empty Re: Port orientation

Post  pkrankow Sun May 12, 2013 7:53 am

The threads were not indexed during manufacture, so the alignment is purely random. The Special .15 MKII is the only cox engine that the threads were timed on so the ports line up in the same place on every engine.

Phil


Last edited by pkrankow on Sun May 12, 2013 3:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
pkrankow
pkrankow
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 3025
Join date : 2012-10-02
Location : Ohio

Back to top Go down

Port orientation Empty Re: Port orientation

Post  Cribbs74 Sun May 12, 2013 8:57 am

RknRusty wrote:No, the distance is not that much different, barely measurable just to knock off a quarter of a thread's depth. The engines probably varied that much from the factory or else the ports would all be aligned the same anyway.

I figured you would have to take more off than that. Time to experiment.
Cribbs74
Cribbs74
Moderator

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

2024 Supporter

Posts : 11907
Join date : 2011-10-24
Age : 50
Location : Tuttle, OK

Back to top Go down

Port orientation Empty Re: Port orientation

Post  Cribbs74 Sun May 12, 2013 8:59 am

pkrankow wrote:The threads were not indexed during manufacture, so the alignment is purely random. The Special .17 MKII is the only cox engine that the threads were timed on so the ports line up in the same place on every engine.

Phil

Correct, except I assume you meant .15 Wink
Cribbs74
Cribbs74
Moderator

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

2024 Supporter

Posts : 11907
Join date : 2011-10-24
Age : 50
Location : Tuttle, OK

Back to top Go down

Port orientation Empty Re: Port orientation

Post  pkrankow Sun May 12, 2013 3:56 pm

cribbs74 wrote:
pkrankow wrote:The threads were not indexed during manufacture, so the alignment is purely random. The Special .17 MKII is the only cox engine that the threads were timed on so the ports line up in the same place on every engine.

Phil

Correct, except I assume you meant .15 Wink

Doh! I thunk I typed that... Huh...

(fixed)

Phil
pkrankow
pkrankow
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 3025
Join date : 2012-10-02
Location : Ohio

Back to top Go down

Port orientation Empty Re: Port orientation

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum