Log in
Search
Latest topics
» My N-1R build logby roddie Yesterday at 9:29 pm
» Funny what you find when you go looking
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 3:21 pm
» Landing-gear tips
by 1975 control line guy Yesterday at 8:17 am
» Purchased the last of any bult engines from Ken Enya
by sosam117 Yesterday at 7:45 am
» Cox NaBOO - Just in time for Halloween
by rsv1cox Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:35 pm
» Canada Post strike - We are still shipping :)
by Cox International Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:01 pm
» Duende V model from RC Model magazine 1983.
by getback Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:08 am
» My current avatar photo
by roddie Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:05 pm
» My latest doodle...
by TD ABUSER Mon Nov 18, 2024 11:30 am
» Brushless motors?
by rsv1cox Sun Nov 17, 2024 6:40 pm
» Free Flight Radio Assist
by rdw777 Sun Nov 17, 2024 6:03 pm
» Tribute Shoestring build
by amurphy6812 Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:43 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
Page 1 of 1
Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
I love these things, and could go deep into their history but that would take pages. Think wiki if you want a deep dive.
The current issue of Air classics got me going again. Pictures from that wonderful magazine.
P-39/P-63 two very different airplanes that looked very similiar. P-39 rounded tail/rudder, much smaller, 3 bladed prop. P-63 much larger, four blade prop, clipped tail/rudder.
I had ambitions of building a mid engine one using a BD-5 engine /drive but gave it away.
I have half a dozen Wen Mac models marketed as both a P-39 and P-63 but they were the same - modeled on the P-63
But, I did not have the much better rendered Cox P-39. Cured that today.
They do fly, successful take off and a pretty landing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjQ4aTQ2L7c
Another "wall of shame" inductee.
The current issue of Air classics got me going again. Pictures from that wonderful magazine.
P-39/P-63 two very different airplanes that looked very similiar. P-39 rounded tail/rudder, much smaller, 3 bladed prop. P-63 much larger, four blade prop, clipped tail/rudder.
I had ambitions of building a mid engine one using a BD-5 engine /drive but gave it away.
I have half a dozen Wen Mac models marketed as both a P-39 and P-63 but they were the same - modeled on the P-63
But, I did not have the much better rendered Cox P-39. Cured that today.
They do fly, successful take off and a pretty landing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjQ4aTQ2L7c
Another "wall of shame" inductee.
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 11244
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
rsv1cox wrote:I love these things, and could go deep into their history but that would take pages. Think wiki if you want a deep dive.
The current issue of Air classics got me going again. Pictures from that wonderful magazine.
P-39/P-63 two very different airplanes that looked very similiar. P-39 rounded tail/rudder, much smaller, 3 bladed prop. P-63 much larger, four blade prop, clipped tail/rudder.
I had ambitions of building a mid engine one using a BD-5 engine /drive but gave it away.
I have half a dozen Wen Mac models marketed as both a P-39 and P-63 but they were the same - modeled on the P-63
Yeah, Air Classsics wreaks constant havoc on my ability to focus on projects...like a dog that doesn't know which car to chase.
Having been "imprinted" at an early age by Wen Mac's Ara/King Cobra, these issues hit me hard. I've started treating most of my printed magazine like newspapers---a read, then out---but the Cobra Issues will stay parked 'till I at least get them scanned into a hard drive.
Kim- Top Poster
-
Posts : 8625
Join date : 2011-09-06
Location : South East Missouri
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
Me - But, I did not have the much better rendered Cox P-39. Cured that today
I don't know now that I have it in hand.
Wen Mac's version despite the elongated nose moment is the better model for many reasons. For one thing it's larger and more robust and was offered in many different variations. It had options that would eject a pilot with parachute and fire spring loaded rockets. Also, it's screwed together not held together by rubber bands.
Wen marketed it as a P-39, a P-63 and and a RAF Day Fighter with the 39 and 63 in different paint schemes.
I have more of them than I should, and I keep the worst boxed away up in the loft.
Size comparison. I like the Wen's but the Cox Airacobra does have something to offer. But not much compares with the Cox Stuka which by it's self is quite marvelous.
I don't know now that I have it in hand.
Wen Mac's version despite the elongated nose moment is the better model for many reasons. For one thing it's larger and more robust and was offered in many different variations. It had options that would eject a pilot with parachute and fire spring loaded rockets. Also, it's screwed together not held together by rubber bands.
Wen marketed it as a P-39, a P-63 and and a RAF Day Fighter with the 39 and 63 in different paint schemes.
I have more of them than I should, and I keep the worst boxed away up in the loft.
Size comparison. I like the Wen's but the Cox Airacobra does have something to offer. But not much compares with the Cox Stuka which by it's self is quite marvelous.
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 11244
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
Nice, interesting how Wen Mac popularized an underdog WW2 fighter. Soviet Union made them work, but I gather they were not as heavily armored and made a good ground attack aircraft.
Advantage over others for better ground handling is the trike gear. Be interesting to see it modeled as a balsa C/L.
Advantage over others for better ground handling is the trike gear. Be interesting to see it modeled as a balsa C/L.
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
-
Posts : 5721
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 70
Location : Clovis NM or NFL KC Chiefs
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 11244
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
That’s weird , just this morning before I even saw this , I was thinking about doing something like that
akjgardner- Diamond Member
-
Posts : 1600
Join date : 2014-12-28
Age : 65
Location : Greensberg Indiana
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
akjgardner wrote:That’s weird , just this morning before I even saw this , I was thinking about doing something like that
I'll expect to see something by the morning Joe.
But a me-too ism. I would like to see what's inside that brass tube.
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 11244
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 11244
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
Maybe a Dornier 335 push pull ?rsv1cox wrote:akjgardner wrote:That’s weird , just this morning before I even saw this , I was thinking about doing something like that
I'll expect to see something by the morning Joe.
But a me-too ism. I would like to see what's inside that brass tube.
akjgardner- Diamond Member
-
Posts : 1600
Join date : 2014-12-28
Age : 65
Location : Greensberg Indiana
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
akjgardner wrote:Maybe a Dornier 335 push pull ?rsv1cox wrote:akjgardner wrote:That’s weird , just this morning before I even saw this , I was thinking about doing something like that
I'll expect to see something by the morning Joe.
But a me-too ism. I would like to see what's inside that brass tube.
There was one more photo of Richard's P39 that I didn't post above.. because it shows two different shafts. One of them incorporates a U-Joint that Richard didn't end up using.. but it does show a "die" which I assume is a 5-40 that he may have used to thread the two ends of a 1/8" diameter music-wire shaft. I think that is "what's inside that brass tube."
Hey Joe, Here's some images that I had saved of the Dornier Do335. A scale model could be built using a pair of Cox .049 reed-valve engines using a prop-drive system like Richard's for the rear engine. Maybe use a ratchet/cam-style starter-spring to help in starting the rear engine.
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
Thanks Roddie, I’m definitely putting that on my todo list. I’ve always liked the looks of that airplane. I’m thinking maybe a 28” wingspan
akjgardner- Diamond Member
-
Posts : 1600
Join date : 2014-12-28
Age : 65
Location : Greensberg Indiana
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
akjgardner wrote:Thanks Roddie, I’m definitely putting that on my todo list. I’ve always liked the looks of that airplane. I’m thinking maybe a 28” wingspan
Well, why not!
Made an offer.......that I'm sure he will take. At least three more here:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/204224575418?hash=item2f8cbbb7ba:g:fyUAAOSwhNZicovd&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA4BWcLVJvrj9%2BPqbUpvFUm%2FcEN28qjgiZyJE%2FwMNHsrgalVwfzfxtxEzi2A1BcYFTKrd1GKGKObcQOMwTZQxRAFJJGH7Hih7sZ7T3H%2FBoVcISX0IS3rMH6TFJOytXo%2BZRhBweuGOW8PdgOtt%2FrPwk5Y1qwPg1BAmTyiQ2NuT9Z%2BkzBNm7hE4QXZ30tLbUbhSKrG3FpT2VG4N4%2FO%2B%2FXmytb4DV6JJ9WeABQqNzQyKk23qIFfQgFVegDK39QxqrR92LVyzVQZTamJbrWLUP9ywAYg8KegPqfmE88rd0iYxLODIu%7Ctkp%3ABFBMvKyOsNhi&autorefresh=true
If true- sounds good:
*Hand Selected Balsa *Color Peel and Stick Decals *9 inch Plastic Propeller *Full Size Plan *F.A.I. Tan II Rubber *Step by Step Instructions *Vacuum Molded Parts *Light Weight Colored Tissue
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 11244
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
The last time I was at the Brodak Fly In , a fellow by the name of John Rist I believe made a profile 1/2A version of this plane using two Cox engines. It was just a piece of art. He did such a nice job machining the shafts and bearing perches for this plane. I saw the plane posted a few times on Stunthangar and never saw it again. Even if it didn't work, it was just inspiring.
Ken Cook- Top Poster
- Posts : 5635
Join date : 2012-03-27
Location : pennsylvania
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
Dumas kit. I don't think I have ever built one. If I do and that's a big if......I would plank it, a couple of .020 Pee Wees and control line. 30" span it would float. Reinforce it and a couple of .049's might offer some fun.
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 11244
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
I just ordered one Bob, I definitely have a problem. I can’t not buy this stuff !!!! Lolrsv1cox wrote:Dumas kit. I don't think I have ever built one. If I do and that's a big if......I would plank it, a couple of .020 Pee Wees and control line. 30" span it would float. Reinforce it and a couple of .049's might offer some fun.
akjgardner- Diamond Member
-
Posts : 1600
Join date : 2014-12-28
Age : 65
Location : Greensberg Indiana
Re: Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
akjgardner wrote:I just ordered one Bob, I definitely have a problem. I can’t not buy this stuff !!!! Lolrsv1cox wrote:Dumas kit. I don't think I have ever built one. If I do and that's a big if......I would plank it, a couple of .020 Pee Wees and control line. 30" span it would float. Reinforce it and a couple of .049's might offer some fun.
Joe, we share the problem to our joy.
So glad that you did, I'm reasonably sure that you will build your's. I may have to corner my son for mine. But you never know, it's going to be a long winter here in the hills of WV.
Bob
rsv1cox- Top Poster
-
Posts : 11244
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia
Similar topics
» P-39 Airacobra from ebay
» Confusion! (not ELO related)
» Cox EZ Flyer P-39 Airacobra
» AMF Wen Mac P-39 Airacobra
» Cox p39 Airacobra
» Confusion! (not ELO related)
» Cox EZ Flyer P-39 Airacobra
» AMF Wen Mac P-39 Airacobra
» Cox p39 Airacobra
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum