Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Tee Dee .020 combat modelby Ken Cook Today at 3:23 am
» My latest doodle...
by batjac Yesterday at 9:47 pm
» My N-1R build log
by roddie Yesterday at 8:50 pm
» Free Flight Radio Assist
by rdw777 Yesterday at 4:51 pm
» Purchased the last of any bult engines from Ken Enya
by getback Yesterday at 12:05 pm
» Funny what you find when you go looking
by rsv1cox Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:21 pm
» Landing-gear tips
by 1975 control line guy Wed Nov 20, 2024 8:17 am
» Cox NaBOO - Just in time for Halloween
by rsv1cox Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:35 pm
» Canada Post strike - We are still shipping :)
by Cox International Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:01 pm
» Duende V model from RC Model magazine 1983.
by getback Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:08 am
» My current avatar photo
by roddie Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:05 pm
» Brushless motors?
by rsv1cox Sun Nov 17, 2024 6:40 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
Duke Engines
Page 1 of 1
Duke Engines
I found this fascinating!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=c19kn3drdFU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=c19kn3drdFU
Re: Duke Engines
So did I. This is quite a concept and I hope it can be developed so that it doesn't turn into a Wankel engine. This was an engine concept that I admired but ...
Friday, June 22, 2012, the Wankel rotary engine's last remaining and steadfast devotee, Mazda, produced their final rotary engine in their Hiroshima plant. The Wankel engine never really fulfilled its promises and hopes, though over its history over 25 major automobile, motorcycle, tractor, and aircraft companies, ranging from Suzuki to Rolls-Royce, were actively researching, developing, and/or building the piston-less engine.
The Wankel motor is one of those things that, for all its issues, was just too pure and beautiful for engineers to ignore. With far fewer parts than a regular reciprocating piston engine and a visually elegant design, it's no wonder Mazda kept with it. For a given displacement, it produces far more power than a given piston engine, at a much smaller size and weight. It can rev faster and is inherently smooth, since the motive force is rotational from start to finish— not the back-and-forth hopping of a piston engine. The down side was that Wankels are always a bit more fuel-gluttonous than a piston engine, and almost always have dirtier exhaust. Poor fuel economy and more polluting are pretty much the only strikes you need against you in our modern age, so the mainstream Wankel is going away.
I hope that this concept can address the issues that drove the Wankel away.
Friday, June 22, 2012, the Wankel rotary engine's last remaining and steadfast devotee, Mazda, produced their final rotary engine in their Hiroshima plant. The Wankel engine never really fulfilled its promises and hopes, though over its history over 25 major automobile, motorcycle, tractor, and aircraft companies, ranging from Suzuki to Rolls-Royce, were actively researching, developing, and/or building the piston-less engine.
The Wankel motor is one of those things that, for all its issues, was just too pure and beautiful for engineers to ignore. With far fewer parts than a regular reciprocating piston engine and a visually elegant design, it's no wonder Mazda kept with it. For a given displacement, it produces far more power than a given piston engine, at a much smaller size and weight. It can rev faster and is inherently smooth, since the motive force is rotational from start to finish— not the back-and-forth hopping of a piston engine. The down side was that Wankels are always a bit more fuel-gluttonous than a piston engine, and almost always have dirtier exhaust. Poor fuel economy and more polluting are pretty much the only strikes you need against you in our modern age, so the mainstream Wankel is going away.
I hope that this concept can address the issues that drove the Wankel away.
ian1954- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2688
Join date : 2011-11-16
Age : 70
Location : England
Re: Duke Engines
I owned an '83 Mazda RX7. I loved that little Wankel, it was smooth and relatively powerful for it's size.
Not so sure how it didn't fulfill a promise when it was used for around 50yrs. That's a pretty long time for such a "dud"
Now I am going to watch the video...
Not so sure how it didn't fulfill a promise when it was used for around 50yrs. That's a pretty long time for such a "dud"
Now I am going to watch the video...
Cribbs74- Moderator
-
Posts : 11907
Join date : 2011-10-24
Age : 50
Location : Tuttle, OK
Re: Duke Engines
Very interesting indeed.
And 91 is our low octane fuel here down under = to 87 in the U.S.
And 91 is our low octane fuel here down under = to 87 in the U.S.
gossie- Gold Member
- Posts : 133
Join date : 2011-10-18
Location : Gold Coast Australia.
Re: Duke Engines
Check out the similarities between this Duke engine and the Waterbury speed gear used on ships 50 years ago and probably still being used.
George
George
gcb- Platinum Member
- Posts : 908
Join date : 2011-08-11
Location : Port Ewen, NY
Re: Duke Engines
I guess the weak point of the Duke concept is the same as that of the Wankel: sealing the compression-exposed, moving parts against flue-gas blow-by.
The block of cylinders in the Duke turn against a stationary engine head in which the spark plugs, suction and exhasut chambers are accommodated. Just think of how difficult it is to seal the plane contact surface between the rotating block of cylinders and the engine head...the same as the rotating Wankel piston peripherial and side sealing issues. No wonder the fuel economy of the Wankel was low.
The block of cylinders in the Duke turn against a stationary engine head in which the spark plugs, suction and exhasut chambers are accommodated. Just think of how difficult it is to seal the plane contact surface between the rotating block of cylinders and the engine head...the same as the rotating Wankel piston peripherial and side sealing issues. No wonder the fuel economy of the Wankel was low.
balogh- Top Poster
-
Posts : 4958
Join date : 2011-11-06
Age : 66
Location : Budapest Hungary
Re: Duke Engines
Some hydraulic pumps and motors use this same layout. This concept on an internal combustion engine allows the adjustment of the stroke length (and compression ratio), which, combined with supercharging, would give a great adjustability and fuel economy. I didn't watch the video (connection problems), so I am sorry if I repeat what has already been said.
Mechanically that is a tough concept, in addition to sealing problems that balogh already mentioned, there would probably be some wear issues in the ball joint in the bottom ends of the con rods. In hydraulic pumps and motors there is a small passage in the bottom of each piston through which the work pressure feeds oil between the surfaces. Hydraulic pressure also builds up a lot slower than cylinder pressure in an internal combustion engine.
But nowadays there are all kinds of new ceramic and other materials, self-lubricating, self repairing etc, so who knows what will happen.
Mechanically that is a tough concept, in addition to sealing problems that balogh already mentioned, there would probably be some wear issues in the ball joint in the bottom ends of the con rods. In hydraulic pumps and motors there is a small passage in the bottom of each piston through which the work pressure feeds oil between the surfaces. Hydraulic pressure also builds up a lot slower than cylinder pressure in an internal combustion engine.
But nowadays there are all kinds of new ceramic and other materials, self-lubricating, self repairing etc, so who knows what will happen.
KariFS- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2044
Join date : 2014-10-10
Age : 53
Similar topics
» Blackhawk Models Nobler?
» My Son Ask Me ..
» From Duke Fox: A Lesson for All You Kids Out There !
» Happy Birthday Duke!!
» Happy Birthday Duke
» My Son Ask Me ..
» From Duke Fox: A Lesson for All You Kids Out There !
» Happy Birthday Duke!!
» Happy Birthday Duke
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum