Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Roger Harris revisitedby rsv1cox Today at 3:38 pm
» My N-1R build log
by GallopingGhostler Today at 3:04 pm
» Tee Dee .020 combat model
by 1/2A Nut Today at 2:43 pm
» Chocolate chip cookie dough.........
by roddie Today at 1:13 pm
» Purchased the last of any bult engines from Ken Enya
by sosam117 Today at 11:32 am
» Free Flight Radio Assist
by rdw777 Today at 9:24 am
» My latest doodle...
by batjac Yesterday at 9:47 pm
» Funny what you find when you go looking
by rsv1cox Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:21 pm
» Landing-gear tips
by 1975 control line guy Wed Nov 20, 2024 8:17 am
» Cox NaBOO - Just in time for Halloween
by rsv1cox Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:35 pm
» Canada Post strike - We are still shipping :)
by Cox International Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:01 pm
» Duende V model from RC Model magazine 1983.
by getback Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:08 am
Cox Engine of The Month
Cast crankcase vs extruded one.
Page 1 of 1
Cast crankcase vs extruded one.
Have any of you run a cast crankcase engine hard? Any problems with durability?
Would the cast crankcase provide lower temperatures in a car engine perhaps because its thinner, and has the fins on front.
Will the killer bee crank fit it properly?
Would the cast crankcase provide lower temperatures in a car engine perhaps because its thinner, and has the fins on front.
Will the killer bee crank fit it properly?
MeerschaumSteve- Gold Member
- Posts : 121
Join date : 2012-10-21
Location : Oklahoma
Re: Cast crankcase vs extruded one.
I think the cast crankcase would wear out pretty fast in the GTP with the side load from the pinion gear during acceleration. I have worn out the extruded ones before to the point where there is a groove cut in the crankcase from the front bearing journal. The davis deisel crankshaft does not have the bearing relief cut into the crankshaft and would probably last the longest in the crankcase.
Jason_WI- Top Poster
-
Posts : 3123
Join date : 2011-10-09
Age : 49
Location : Neenah, WI
Re: Cast crankcase vs extruded one.
If you have a lathe you could bore out a case and use some copper or brass tubing, shrink it in, and make a new bearing that will be 10 or 100 times the durability of the original anodized aluminum.
I won't call it "easy" but it is a straightforward process. The difficulty is the precision.
Phil
I won't call it "easy" but it is a straightforward process. The difficulty is the precision.
Phil
pkrankow- Top Poster
- Posts : 3025
Join date : 2012-10-02
Location : Ohio
Re: Cast crankcase vs extruded one.
pkrankow wrote:If you have a lathe you could bore out a case and use some copper or brass tubing, shrink it in, and make a new bearing that will be 10 or 100 times the durability of the original anodized aluminum.
I won't call it "easy" but it is a straightforward process. The difficulty is the precision.
Phil
Hi Phil,
I would favour using phosphor bronze as the bearing material but it is a little expensive.
Copper or brass will work fine but copper tends not to last very long - it tends to soften "anneal" as it heats up.
Provision also needs to be made for lubrication. The standard crancases (cast and extruded) have a groove to lubricate the crankshaft. This should be reinstated in the bearing.
I tend to not use a single tube the full length of the crankshaft but use two smaller tubes. Then for the difficult bit - I drill a hole at an angle from where the base of the cylinder head fits to the gap between the two bearing tubes so that this does away with the need for a groove and lubricates the gap between the two bearing tubes.
Ian
ian1954- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2688
Join date : 2011-11-16
Age : 70
Location : England
Similar topics
» Die cast crankcase vs. extruded...
» Arty105 Cast or extruded ?
» Hmmm... How come?
» Die Cast 049's
» The history of the Cox .049 Die Cast crankcases
» Arty105 Cast or extruded ?
» Hmmm... How come?
» Die Cast 049's
» The history of the Cox .049 Die Cast crankcases
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum