Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Roger Harris revisitedby rsv1cox Today at 3:38 pm
» My N-1R build log
by GallopingGhostler Today at 3:04 pm
» Tee Dee .020 combat model
by 1/2A Nut Today at 2:43 pm
» Chocolate chip cookie dough.........
by roddie Today at 1:13 pm
» Purchased the last of any bult engines from Ken Enya
by sosam117 Today at 11:32 am
» Free Flight Radio Assist
by rdw777 Today at 9:24 am
» My latest doodle...
by batjac Yesterday at 9:47 pm
» Funny what you find when you go looking
by rsv1cox Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:21 pm
» Landing-gear tips
by 1975 control line guy Wed Nov 20, 2024 8:17 am
» Cox NaBOO - Just in time for Halloween
by rsv1cox Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:35 pm
» Canada Post strike - We are still shipping :)
by Cox International Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:01 pm
» Duende V model from RC Model magazine 1983.
by getback Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:08 am
Cox Engine of The Month
A question of terminology
Page 1 of 1
A question of terminology
I was just thinking, I've always referred to the more common Cox engines as Bees, TeeDees, Medallions, Postage Stamps,or Product Engines. "Bee" is the term I use generically for any tank backed engine. But can a product engine be called a "Bee"?
The Etymologist Mark
The Etymologist Mark
batjac- Diamond Member
-
Posts : 2374
Join date : 2013-05-22
Age : 61
Location : Broken Arrow, OK, USA
Re: A question of terminology
I got your point Mark and will rename my COX Engine of the month entry....the reason I named this engine Bahama Bee was the alliteration of Bee and Bahama....once I was told on CEF the sexy names and good quality of the photo on a common engine may earn you as many votes as you would earn with a real speciality engine..not that I expect any better results with any name or any entry I make
balogh- Top Poster
-
Posts : 4958
Join date : 2011-11-06
Age : 66
Location : Budapest Hungary
Re: A question of terminology
Good point Mark. But there is always the exception to the rule:
Killer Bee
Killer Bee
KariFS- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2044
Join date : 2014-10-10
Age : 53
Re: A question of terminology
balogh wrote:I got your point Mark and will rename my COX Engine of the month entry....the reason I named this engine Bahama Bee was the alliteration of Bee and Bahama....once I was told on CEF the sexy names and good quality of the photo on a common engine may earn you as many votes as you would earn with a real speciality engine..not that I expect any better results with any name or any entry I make
Sorry, I wasn't referring to your entry. I was just musing about terms in connection with my thoughts on putting a Cox Bee on a Walker FireBee. Since the Walker Firecracker uses an external tank, it would be preferable to use a Cox engine that takes an external tank and a throttle ring, like on the Cox throttled Mustang.
The Pondering Mark
batjac- Diamond Member
-
Posts : 2374
Join date : 2013-05-22
Age : 61
Location : Broken Arrow, OK, USA
Re: A question of terminology
Or.... Maybe a Medallion .049 with the throttle ring from the Cox Mustang. Maybe a Medallion 049 would be equal to a .065 Firecracker. It wouldn't be variable throttle like the original FireBee, but it would idle and fly full throttle.
The Idle Mark
No, no way a Medallion could be termed a "Bee". Nevermind. Stupid idea.
The Idle Mark
No, no way a Medallion could be termed a "Bee". Nevermind. Stupid idea.
batjac- Diamond Member
-
Posts : 2374
Join date : 2013-05-22
Age : 61
Location : Broken Arrow, OK, USA
Similar topics
» Tee Dee .09 question
» Another Question?.
» Oriental ARF assembly
» Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
» Medallion needle
» Another Question?.
» Oriental ARF assembly
» Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
» Medallion needle
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum