Cox Engines Forum
You are not logged in! Please login or register.

Logged in members see NO ADVERTISEMENTS!


A question of terminology Cox_ba12




A question of terminology Pixel

Log in

I forgot my password

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Roger Harris revisited
by rsv1cox Today at 3:38 pm

» My N-1R build log
by GallopingGhostler Today at 3:04 pm

» Tee Dee .020 combat model
by 1/2A Nut Today at 2:43 pm

» Chocolate chip cookie dough.........
by roddie Today at 1:13 pm

» Purchased the last of any bult engines from Ken Enya
by sosam117 Today at 11:32 am

» Free Flight Radio Assist
by rdw777 Today at 9:24 am

» My latest doodle...
by batjac Yesterday at 9:47 pm

» Funny what you find when you go looking
by rsv1cox Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:21 pm

» Landing-gear tips
by 1975 control line guy Wed Nov 20, 2024 8:17 am

» Cox NaBOO - Just in time for Halloween
by rsv1cox Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:35 pm

» Canada Post strike - We are still shipping :)
by Cox International Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:01 pm

» Duende V model from RC Model magazine 1983.
by getback Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:08 am

Cox Engine of The Month
November-2024
Kim's

"A Space Bug Jr. pulls the Q-Tee up high over Sky Tiger Field"



PAST WINNERS
CEF Traveling Engine

Win This Engine!
Gallery


A question of terminology Empty
Live on Patrol


A question of terminology

Go down

A question of terminology Empty A question of terminology

Post  batjac Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:28 pm

I was just thinking, I've always referred to the more common Cox engines as Bees, TeeDees, Medallions, Postage Stamps,or Product Engines.  "Bee" is the term I use generically for any tank backed engine.  But can a product engine be called a "Bee"?

The Etymologist Mark
batjac
batjac
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

Posts : 2374
Join date : 2013-05-22
Age : 61
Location : Broken Arrow, OK, USA

Back to top Go down

A question of terminology Empty Re: A question of terminology

Post  balogh Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm

I got your point Mark and will rename my COX Engine of the month entry....the reason I named this engine Bahama Bee was the alliteration of Bee and Bahama....once I was told on CEF the sexy names and good quality of the photo on a common engine may earn you as many votes as you would earn with a real speciality engine..not that I expect any better results with any name or any entry I make  Very Happy
balogh
balogh
Top Poster
Top Poster

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

Posts : 4958
Join date : 2011-11-06
Age : 66
Location : Budapest Hungary

Back to top Go down

A question of terminology Empty Re: A question of terminology

Post  KariFS Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:19 pm

Good point Mark. But there is always the exception to the rule:

Killer Bee Huh...

KariFS
KariFS
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Posts : 2044
Join date : 2014-10-10
Age : 53

Back to top Go down

A question of terminology Empty Re: A question of terminology

Post  batjac Fri Sep 02, 2016 5:18 pm

balogh wrote:I got your point Mark and will rename my COX Engine of the month entry....the reason I named this engine Bahama Bee was the alliteration of Bee and Bahama....once I was told on CEF the sexy names and good quality of the photo on a common engine may earn you as many votes as you would earn with a real speciality engine..not that I expect any better results with any name or any entry I make  Very Happy

Sorry, I wasn't referring to your entry.  I was just musing about terms in connection with my thoughts on putting a Cox Bee on a Walker FireBee.  Since the Walker Firecracker uses an external tank, it would be preferable to use a Cox engine that takes an external tank and a throttle ring, like on the Cox throttled Mustang.

The Pondering Mark
batjac
batjac
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

Posts : 2374
Join date : 2013-05-22
Age : 61
Location : Broken Arrow, OK, USA

Back to top Go down

A question of terminology Empty Re: A question of terminology

Post  batjac Fri Sep 02, 2016 5:22 pm

Or....  Maybe a Medallion .049 with the throttle ring from the Cox Mustang.  Maybe a Medallion 049 would be equal to a .065 Firecracker.  It wouldn't be  variable throttle like the original FireBee, but it would idle and fly full throttle.

The Idle Mark

No, no way a Medallion could be termed a "Bee". Nevermind. Stupid idea.
batjac
batjac
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

Posts : 2374
Join date : 2013-05-22
Age : 61
Location : Broken Arrow, OK, USA

Back to top Go down

A question of terminology Empty Re: A question of terminology

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum