Cox Engines Forum
You are not logged in! Please login or register.

Logged in members see NO ADVERTISEMENTS!


Rough Man-Win Trainers Cox_ba12




Rough Man-Win Trainers Pixel

Log in

I forgot my password

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Purchased the last of any bult engines from Ken Enya
by Coxfledgling Today at 4:18 am

» My N-1R build log
by roddie Today at 12:32 am

» Happy 77th birthday Andrew!
by akjgardner Today at 12:27 am

» TEE DEE Having issues
by TD ABUSER Yesterday at 9:43 pm

» Landing-gear tips
by roddie Yesterday at 6:17 pm

» Roger Harris revisited
by TD ABUSER Yesterday at 2:13 pm

» Tee Dee .020 combat model
by Ken Cook Yesterday at 1:41 pm

» Retail price mark-up.. how much is enough?
by Ken Cook Yesterday at 1:37 pm

» My latest doodle...
by roddie Yesterday at 10:43 am

» Chocolate chip cookie dough.........
by roddie Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:13 pm

» Free Flight Radio Assist
by rdw777 Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:24 am

» Funny what you find when you go looking
by rsv1cox Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:21 pm

Cox Engine of The Month
November-2024
Kim's

"A Space Bug Jr. pulls the Q-Tee up high over Sky Tiger Field"



PAST WINNERS
CEF Traveling Engine

Win This Engine!
Gallery


Rough Man-Win Trainers Empty
Live on Patrol


Rough Man-Win Trainers

Go down

LOL Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  bakergw Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:51 pm

Goodaye All,

I have built and flown some of the coroplast Man-Win trainers and was quite impressed with them. I did end up customising the design to suit my needs, but the original design is a fantastic design and I would never have come up with such a great and simple and cheap design that works! cheers So please, my customisation is in no way intended as criticism of the original and freely available design.

I wanted to be able to fly the plane on 42 or even 52 foot lines and my first build of one I built pretty much to the plans albeit very rough and ready, as is my way. Lol. It is shown in the photo below painted in red. It flew well, but tended to float a lot, and was difficult to hand launch with a surestart unmuffled and 6 x 4 prop at 25% nitro. Rightly or wrongly we hand launch by just letting go of the plane. I started flying again about a year ago with an old racing friend and we hadnt flown for over 40 something years. Lol Old Bugger We used to always fly combat wings such as the Dominator and Warlord and they always launched that way fine.

I cut down the size of the Man-win quite a bit as shown in the photo and it just flys beautifully out of the hands of the launcher. Pulls really well on 42 foot lines and flys quite quickly and responds really  nicely. Lots of technical issues with my build, I know, like tank on wrong side, but pressure fixes that. Very nose heavy and when the engine stops it heads for the ground like a dive bomber  Laughing and it is just a flat slab. Oh well, they are easy to make and I will sort that out. Definately easy build and fun to fly depending on what you are looking for in flying etc.

Rough Man-Win Trainers Sq111

Take it easy. :-)

Cheers,
Gary
avatar
bakergw
Account Deactivated by Owner

Posts : 76
Join date : 2020-09-20

Back to top Go down

LOL Re: Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  Cribbs74 Sun Mar 07, 2021 2:10 pm

Hey Gary,

Sounds like you are having fun. Your tank mounting does go against conventional wisdom. However the side you mounted the tank on is fine. A more centralized mounting directly behind the engine mount might work better. If it was me though, and because it’s a slab wing I would just build a shelf off the wing to bring the tank closer to the NV. It certainly won’t help with the nose heavy situation and to be honest, because it’s a trainer it was probably designed nose heavy. This could however, alleviate some weight as you most likely could remove the muffler and pressure apparatus.

You didn’t ask for suggestions, just couldn’t help myself...

Imagine how nose heavy it would be with an 8cc stunt tanked bee engine!
Cribbs74
Cribbs74
Moderator

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

2024 Supporter

Posts : 11907
Join date : 2011-10-24
Age : 50
Location : Tuttle, OK

Back to top Go down

LOL Re: Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  bakergw Sun Mar 07, 2021 2:24 pm

You post, you ask for suggestions, part of the territory :-). Nothing sends me crazy at work as an engineer than no suggestions from anyone. Who knows they might be good. Lol. The only thing Im always right about, is that Im not always right. lol!

Cheers,
Gary
avatar
bakergw
Account Deactivated by Owner

Posts : 76
Join date : 2020-09-20

Back to top Go down

LOL Re: Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  aspeed Sun Mar 07, 2021 10:13 pm

I made something similar probably just before the Manwin. Used an old TD, but now it has a Norvel. Goes pretty fast, no glide at all, and mushy loops. 42 ft lines. That was around the early 1990s. Made one for a .15 too. Worked well, stopped flying it after a while. Based the shape on an F2D, but cut it with tin snips to more of a Jr. Satan. There was an old combat model from
maybe the 1960s called the Bamboozle that used cardboard for the wing and a bamboo fuselage that I kind of copied. As soon as I saw coroplast, I had to use that stuff.
No paint. Rough Man-Win Trainers Coro_016
Rough Man-Win Trainers Coro_015
Rough Man-Win Trainers Variou13
aspeed
aspeed
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Posts : 796
Join date : 2013-01-18
Location : Leamington Ont. Can.

Back to top Go down

LOL Re: Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  bakergw Sun Mar 07, 2021 11:31 pm

nice weekend plane! just my type of plane. Laughing Hearing yours doesnt glide either makes me feel a bit better about mine. :-)
Im thinking of moving the engine right back into one of them to try and balance it up a bit better. Probably make no difference as the thing is just a flat sheet with an engine, elevator and lines. Im sure I have seen photos of your plane, or maybe its predecessor in the outerzone plans section.

Cheers,
Gary
avatar
bakergw
Account Deactivated by Owner

Posts : 76
Join date : 2020-09-20

Back to top Go down

LOL Re: Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  aspeed Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:41 am

I would balance it for flight, not glide. Even the electric flat foamies don't glide at all. There is an airfoil, it's just that it is a really poor one. They are pretty light and can take a rough landing.
aspeed
aspeed
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Posts : 796
Join date : 2013-01-18
Location : Leamington Ont. Can.

Back to top Go down

LOL Re: Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  andrew Mon Mar 08, 2021 11:55 am

ManWin trainers: 100 years of airfoil design out the door! Very Happy
andrew
andrew
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Posts : 1816
Join date : 2011-08-11
Age : 77
Location : Western Kentucky

http://web2.murraystate.edu/andy.batts/ps/POWERSUPPLY.HTM

Back to top Go down

LOL Re: Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  Kim Mon Mar 08, 2021 12:11 pm

andrew wrote:ManWin trainers:  100 years of airfoil design out the door! Very Happy

"Airfoiled"!!! Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
Kim
Kim
Top Poster
Top Poster

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

2024 Supporter

Posts : 8625
Join date : 2011-09-06
Location : South East Missouri

Back to top Go down

LOL Re: Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  NEW222 Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:38 pm

andrew wrote:ManWin trainers:  100 years of airfoil design out the door! Very Happy

The best line I heard lately!
NEW222
NEW222
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 3896
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 46
Location : oakbank, mb

Back to top Go down

LOL Re: Rough Man-Win Trainers

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum