Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Betty Skelton by GallopingGhostler Today at 8:20 pm
» Consolidated half-A C/L Sonic Star
by GallopingGhostler Today at 6:46 pm
» Jim Walker Bonanza etc.
by Ken Cook Today at 5:03 pm
» New Model Build
by rdw777 Today at 2:52 pm
» The box, "Dad's Christmas Bells", and a Cox and Cabin connection
by rsv1cox Today at 10:52 am
» 1:64 scale Diecast (Hot Wheels)
by roddie Today at 10:30 am
» The Cabin.........A carpenters nightmare.
by roddie Today at 10:02 am
» THE MOST ULTIMATE TD .049 POWERED COMBAT PLANE OF ALL TIME...!!!
by TD ABUSER Today at 9:25 am
» 1940's?...............
by rsv1cox Today at 7:46 am
» **VOTE-ON-THE-NEXT-COX-ENGINE-OF-THE-MONTH** (September 2024)
by akjgardner Today at 7:19 am
» Lesson learned
by TD ABUSER Yesterday at 6:22 pm
» Billy's Scientific "Sizzlin Liz" Mustang
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 5:21 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
August-2024
balogh's
"Cox TD09 R/C Beast of Burden featuring Kamtechnik head and DIY metallic fuel nipple"
PAST WINNERS
balogh's
"Cox TD09 R/C Beast of Burden featuring Kamtechnik head and DIY metallic fuel nipple"
PAST WINNERS
Buzzbipe RC 010
Page 3 of 3
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Buzzbipe RC 010
Sure Mauricio the engine should be offset. The point is though that even if I throw the plane with the engine NOT running i.e. the swirling airflow blown by the prop NOT pushing the tail to the right, the plane flips over...meaning it is unstable because the moments of aerodynamic forces do not balance the moment of the weight in the CG because this is located too high up..
Otherwise all settings i.e. angles of attack on both wings, longitudinal position of CG etc are as per the building instructions. As FMK models - the seller of this plane- advised some posts higher up the plane was originally designed for heavier servos,battery and receiver. The light gear I use today does not bring the CG down low enough. I need to bring it down by placing the battery below the fuselage..I could as well add balancing weight on the front floor of the fuselage but I do not want to compromise the overall light weight because I want a fast plane..
Otherwise all settings i.e. angles of attack on both wings, longitudinal position of CG etc are as per the building instructions. As FMK models - the seller of this plane- advised some posts higher up the plane was originally designed for heavier servos,battery and receiver. The light gear I use today does not bring the CG down low enough. I need to bring it down by placing the battery below the fuselage..I could as well add balancing weight on the front floor of the fuselage but I do not want to compromise the overall light weight because I want a fast plane..
balogh- Top Poster
-
Posts : 4868
Join date : 2011-11-06
Age : 65
Location : Budapest Hungary
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum