Cox Engines Forum
You are not logged in! Please login or register.

Logged in members see NO ADVERTISEMENTS!


Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe Cox_ba12




Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe Pixel

Log in

I forgot my password

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» My latest doodle...
by batjac Yesterday at 10:05 pm

» Retail price mark-up.. how much is enough?
by gkamysz Yesterday at 9:29 pm

» Happy 77th birthday Andrew!
by roddie Yesterday at 9:22 pm

» Roger Harris revisited
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 3:38 pm

» My N-1R build log
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 3:04 pm

» Tee Dee .020 combat model
by 1/2A Nut Yesterday at 2:43 pm

» Chocolate chip cookie dough.........
by roddie Yesterday at 1:13 pm

» Purchased the last of any bult engines from Ken Enya
by sosam117 Yesterday at 11:32 am

» Free Flight Radio Assist
by rdw777 Yesterday at 9:24 am

» Funny what you find when you go looking
by rsv1cox Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:21 pm

» Landing-gear tips
by 1975 control line guy Wed Nov 20, 2024 8:17 am

» Cox NaBOO - Just in time for Halloween
by rsv1cox Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:35 pm

Cox Engine of The Month
November-2024
Kim's

"A Space Bug Jr. pulls the Q-Tee up high over Sky Tiger Field"



PAST WINNERS
CEF Traveling Engine

Win This Engine!
Gallery


Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe Empty
Live on Patrol


Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe

Go down

Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe Empty Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe

Post  SuperDave Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:34 am

I'm finding this kit WAY too nose heavy with a BW up front and will probably replace it with the much lighter PeeWee .020 which is at the bottom end of the kit's power recommendation. If I were to fly it with the BW it would have the glide characteristics of a BRICK. To try to balance is at the recommended CG would require a considerable amount of added flight weight.

The building process as been confounded by errors and omissions in the plans. "Decals" are actually in fact stickers, ill-fitting at that. Certainly not the kit developed by the late Carl Goldberg.

I would be extremely hesitant to attempt another adaptation of any of Goldberg's kits. They simply are not of the quality they once where.
SuperDave
SuperDave
Rest In Peace
Rest In Peace

Posts : 3552
Join date : 2011-08-13
Location : Washington (state)

Back to top Go down

Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe Empty Re: Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe

Post  nitroairplane Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:30 pm

I'd recommend a tee dee .020 but this is the wrong section so it will be moved to the cox discussions section,
Indra
nitroairplane
nitroairplane
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 6956
Join date : 2011-04-11
Location : London

http://modeldieselengines.forumstopic.com/

Back to top Go down

Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe Empty Re: Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe

Post  SuperDave Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:52 pm

This morning I e'd John Brodak re: The "Toot".

John indicated that it is in the process of revision from the Goldberg original "Toot" as well a several of the other more popular small Goldberg CL planes.

He recommends specifing the Brodak revision of any Goldberg plane from any sources that offer them.
SuperDave
SuperDave
Rest In Peace
Rest In Peace

Posts : 3552
Join date : 2011-08-13
Location : Washington (state)

Back to top Go down

Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe Empty Re: Brodak/Goldberg kit critique: "Lil Toot" bipe

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum