Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Roger Harris revisitedby TD ABUSER Today at 2:30 am
» My latest doodle...
by batjac Yesterday at 10:05 pm
» Retail price mark-up.. how much is enough?
by gkamysz Yesterday at 9:29 pm
» Happy 77th birthday Andrew!
by roddie Yesterday at 9:22 pm
» My N-1R build log
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 3:04 pm
» Tee Dee .020 combat model
by 1/2A Nut Yesterday at 2:43 pm
» Chocolate chip cookie dough.........
by roddie Yesterday at 1:13 pm
» Purchased the last of any bult engines from Ken Enya
by sosam117 Yesterday at 11:32 am
» Free Flight Radio Assist
by rdw777 Yesterday at 9:24 am
» Funny what you find when you go looking
by rsv1cox Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:21 pm
» Landing-gear tips
by 1975 control line guy Wed Nov 20, 2024 8:17 am
» Cox NaBOO - Just in time for Halloween
by rsv1cox Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:35 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
Great CL site
Page 1 of 1
Great CL site
In my recent thirst to get up to speed on current CL stuff, I came upon this site .
Lots of great stuff there... Check out the hangar.
Lots of great stuff there... Check out the hangar.
Cz10- Gold Member
- Posts : 229
Join date : 2011-08-17
Re: Great CL site
The Stuka is fantastic.
I had this site in my favorites but lost it somehow, great that you reminded!
I had this site in my favorites but lost it somehow, great that you reminded!
Last edited by jetpack on Thu Sep 15, 2011 12:50 am; edited 1 time in total
jetpack- Gold Member
- Posts : 173
Join date : 2011-08-15
Age : 61
Location : Hobart, Indiana
Re: Great CL site
Jetpack - I was thinking about your "Favorite Engine". I think it was because:
It was unconventional for an engine that size. Weight was not as much of a consideration as it was in 1/2A. Also, much more competition. I think there were a lot more decent running .15 from multiple sources then in the 1/2A world which Cox was the dominate force.
It was more $ ( as I recall) then other .15 engines.
Bastard size - not many .15 size airframes. More .09, .19 and of course .35. Most airframes in that range were .09 - .19... Why not go for the maximum?
It was unconventional for an engine that size. Weight was not as much of a consideration as it was in 1/2A. Also, much more competition. I think there were a lot more decent running .15 from multiple sources then in the 1/2A world which Cox was the dominate force.
It was more $ ( as I recall) then other .15 engines.
Bastard size - not many .15 size airframes. More .09, .19 and of course .35. Most airframes in that range were .09 - .19... Why not go for the maximum?
Last edited by Cz10 on Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:15 am; edited 2 times in total
Cz10- Gold Member
- Posts : 229
Join date : 2011-08-17
Re: Great CL site
cz: Strange that I don't get a site reference. Can you help?
SD
SD
SuperDave- Rest In Peace
- Posts : 3552
Join date : 2011-08-13
Location : Washington (state)
Re: Great CL site
This was my complaint about hyperlinks being nearly the same color as the normal text.
The last 2 words in the first line of my op is a hyperlink to the site.
The last 2 words in the first line of my op is a hyperlink to the site.
Cz10- Gold Member
- Posts : 229
Join date : 2011-08-17
Re: Great CL site
cz:
Suggest that you C&P the site for display here.
SD
Suggest that you C&P the site for display here.
SD
SuperDave- Rest In Peace
- Posts : 3552
Join date : 2011-08-13
Location : Washington (state)
Re: Great CL site
Cz10 wrote:http://www.clacro.de/
cz: Got it! Thank you.
SD
SuperDave- Rest In Peace
- Posts : 3552
Join date : 2011-08-13
Location : Washington (state)
Similar topics
» Great site for historical and current SIG kits....
» Aurora B-25
» TD 051 pressure backplates
» my "twin bee"
» RC build of a Guillows Porter PC-6 for .020 Pee Wee
» Aurora B-25
» TD 051 pressure backplates
» my "twin bee"
» RC build of a Guillows Porter PC-6 for .020 Pee Wee
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum